Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Creating liberating content

Bitcoin Is Primed For...

What happens when the Fed and Treasury finally step...

Congress wants to make...

A House crypto tax overhaul would raise an estimated $500 million while easing...

CoinEx quits after 9...

Crypto exchange CoinEx is shutting down after nine years, citing shrinking revenue and...

Bitcoin, BTC-Related Stocks Tumble...

Bitcoin’s price tumbled — along with crypto-related stocks — following the blockage of...

Zilliqa Ledger bug exposed 6,772 accounts

A recent Zilliqa Ledger bug exposed at least 6,772 accounts, according to the post-mortem, and enabled the theft of 683,130,969.66 ZIL across 66 successful attack-window transactions. The disclosure turned an earlier unquantified security flaw into a measured loss and exposure record while, as of the same date, legacy transactions remained paused and holders faced an undated migration to Zilliqa EVM.

The figures measure different parts of the incident. Zilliqa separates 51 drained accounts from the 6,772 accounts whose private keys were shown to be exposed. The post-mortem leaves the number of affected people unquantified.

The exposed-account total is a floor. The 683.13 million ZIL total is exact for the compromised accounts currently known, according to the post-mortem, and it could rise if investigators prove that additional compromised accounts produced theft transactions.

Related Reading

A 7 year Ledger bug lets attackers rebuild a private key from five signatures in seconds

Read More:  Dario Amodei’s three-stage pacing plan

Why four signatures matter

Zilliqa said the application generated 40 random bytes but copied the wrong 32 bytes into its signing buffer, retaining eight bytes of zero padding and discarding eight bytes of entropy. That forced the high 64 bits of every affected nonce to zero.

Four or more biased signatures produced by the legacy Ledger application for the same account could then allow an attacker to reconstruct its private key from public blockchain data in seconds on ordinary hardware, according to Zilliqa. Already-published signatures cannot be withdrawn, so correcting the application can protect new keys but cannot repair keys already exposed.

Related Reading

A flaw in Coldcard seed generation lets attackers recreate private keys from the press of a button

The bulk scan behind the published count required at least five native signatures in a single signer era. The mathematical exposure floor is four biased signatures. Accounts with exactly four signatures were therefore absent from the bulk population count. Zilliqa’s live per-address checker uses tighter parameters and reports four-signature cases, while re-running the wider scan under those parameters remains outstanding.

Read More:  Coinbase CEO sees Bitcoin at $400,000, but first it has to clear $81,000