Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Creating liberating content

XRP gains nearly 30%...

Ripple is extending XRP’s push into US college sports, adding Louisville to a...

Bitcoin Is Primed For...

What happens when the Fed and Treasury finally step...

Congress wants to make...

A House crypto tax overhaul would raise an estimated $500 million while easing...

CoinEx quits after 9...

Crypto exchange CoinEx is shutting down after nine years, citing shrinking revenue and...

Winklevoss twins gave Trump’s super PAC $10 million 23 days after CFTC joined Gemini relief bid

Newly filed federal election records show Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss gave $10.018 million in Bitcoin to MAGA Inc., the super PAC aligned with President Donald Trump, on June 19, 2026.

The gifts came 23 days after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced that it had joined the brothers’ crypto exchange, Gemini, in seeking relief from a 2025 judgment.

The FEC filing shows that the committee sold the donated Bitcoin through Gemini. The donation came 23 days after the CFTC joined Gemini’s effort to undo parts of its 2025 judgment, although the filing offers no evidence linking the two events.

The dates establish a sequence, but the records provide no clear evidence that the donations caused or influenced the CFTC’s action, that the agency coordinated with the donors, or that a quid pro quo occurred.

Cameron’s records total $5,006,604.47 and Tyler’s total $5,011,860.44. Four June 19 rows naming Gemini add up to exactly the same $10,018,464.91 and say the Bitcoin was sold through the exchange to unknown purchasers.

Read More:  The Next Phase of Tokenization Is Utility

FEC rules require a political committee selling donated Bitcoin to name the exchange. The buyer can remain anonymous and does not count as a contributor.

Why the CFTC changed course

The CFTC said its review concluded that the complaint against Gemini would not have been filed under current enforcement standards.

The agency cited credibility problems with a whistleblower account and weaknesses in the evidence, including supporting material requested by a commissioner but not supplied before the case was authorized. It also said privilege and relevance objections impeded Gemini’s defense and that regulatory authority had been used improperly as settlement leverage.