Saturday, August 1, 2026

Creating liberating content

Bitcoin just slept through...

Bitcoin's leverage gauges barely flinched after Friday's Bank of Japan decision. A yen...

Why 110 corporate blockchains...

Corporate blockchains are multiplying, but Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong expects the boom to...

Coldcard Wallet Flaw Exposes...

The popular Bitcoin hardware wallet Coldcard product, made by Coinkite, is...

Coinbase spent 5 years...

Coinbase told investors on Thursday that 88% of its second-quarter net revenue came...

Ethereum is losing ownership of crypto payments as Base moves $565B in stablecoins

Stablecoin activity is becoming a contest over which blockchains move the most tokenized dollars.

Visa Onchain Analytics showed that the adjusted stablecoin transaction volume reached about $1.79 trillion in June, surpassing its February high and rising sharply from May. The key network split was tight: Base ranked first at about $565 billion in adjusted volume, just ahead of Ethereum at roughly $562 billion.

While the edge Base might have over Ethereum might be small, it’s still a significant achievement. Base is a layer-2 network built around cheaper, faster Ethereum activity. When it rises to the top of an adjusted stablecoin flow table, it shifts attention from token supply to payment distribution: wallets, fees, app integrations, and settlement availability.

Visa’s dashboard separates adjusted and unadjusted activity because raw blockchain volume can include bots, high-frequency wallets, internal smart contract movement, and intra-exchange transfers. Its adjusted methodology, developed with Allium and other partners, tries to strip out that noise and get closer to activity that looks and feels like real settlement.

Read More:  These crypto tokens could be the biggest winners from the CLARITY Act

The filters are still a best-guess approach, and Visa says it will keep improving its methodology as labeling coverage expands. Even with that limitation, adjusted volume is more useful for the Base-Ethereum comparison than raw transfer volume alone, as it shows where meaningful stablecoin movement is happening.

The issuer split reinforced USDC’s role in stablecoin settlement. USDC accounted for roughly 67% of June’s adjusted volume, while USDT accounted for about 32%. That keeps USDC at the center of stablecoin flows, particularly on Base, but the more important shift remains how volume is distributed across networks.